Improved outcomes in relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: a single-center real-world analysis of evolving treatment standards
,
 
,
 
,
 
,
 
,
 
Hareth Nahi 1,3,4
,
 
,
 
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Department of Medicine, Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
 
2
Department of Hematology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
 
3
Pfizer Inc, Solna, Sweden
 
4
Department of Medicine, Södersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
 
 
Submission date: 2025-03-11
 
 
Final revision date: 2025-07-22
 
 
Acceptance date: 2025-08-21
 
 
Online publication date: 2026-03-16
 
 
Corresponding author
Vincent Luong   

Department of Medicine, Center for Hematology and Regenerative Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
 
 
 
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Novel drugs have recently been introduced into the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Their impact on clinical outcomes in real-world settings remains to be clarified. To address this question, we evaluated survival outcomes in two real-world RRMM patient cohorts at our center, stratified by the time point when anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody treatment became available in routine clinical practice (January 1, 2013-June 30, 2018 vs. July 1, 2018-December 31, 2022). Patients in the post-July 2018 cohort had superior outcomes, with improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) at 2-6 lines of therapy (LOT). This was statistically significant at 2-6 LOT for PFS and 2-4 LOT for OS (p < 0.05). Among triple-class exposed patients (previous or ongoing exposure to proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies), OS was significantly superior at 2-4 LOT and PFS superior at 4 LOT. Thus, this study provides evidence that the evolving standard-of-care in RRMM in recent years has markedly improved clinical outcomes. Our results emphasize the importance of using modern treatment options in the RRMM setting and the continued need to develop novel treatments to further improve patient outcomes.
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Kumar SK, Rajkumar V, Kyle RA, et al. (2017): Multiple myeloma. Nat Rev Dis Primers 3: 17046.
 
2.
Kumar SK, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, et al. (2014): Continued improvement in survival in multiple myeloma: changes in early mortality and outcomes in older patients. Leukemia 28: 1122-1128.
 
3.
Kumar SK, Dimopoulos MA, Kastritis E, et al. (2017): Natural history of relapsed myeloma, refractory to immunomodulatory drugs and proteasome inhibitors: a multicenter IMWG study. Leukemia 31: 2443-2448.
 
4.
Kumar SK, Lee JH, Lahuerta JJ, et al. (2012): Risk of progression and survival in multiple myeloma relapsing after therapy with IMiDs and bortezomib: a multicenter international myeloma working group study. Leukemia 26: 149-157.
 
5.
Atrash S, Mammadzadeh A, Peng F, et al. (2023): Outcomes of penta-refractory multiple myeloma patients treated with or without BCMA-directed therapy. Cancers (Basel) 15: 2891.
 
6.
Moreau P, Kumar SK, San Miguel J, et al. (2021): Treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: recommendations from the International Myeloma Working Group. Lancet Oncol 22: e105-e118.
 
7.
Cornell RF, Kassim AA (2016): Evolving paradigms in the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: increased options and increased complexity. Bone Marrow Transplant 51: 479-491.
 
8.
Bhatt P, Kloock C, Comenzo R (2023): Relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma: A review of available therapies and clinical scenarios encountered in myeloma relapse. Curr Oncol 30: 2322-2347.
 
9.
Rafei H, Haroun F, Tabbara IA (2019): Novel immunotherapeutic agents for the treatment of multiple myeloma. Am J Clin Oncol 42: 317-329.
 
10.
Chim CS, Kumar SK, Orlowski RZ, et al. (2018): Management of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma: novel agents, antibodies, immunotherapies and beyond. Leukemia 32: 252-262.
 
11.
Jadoon Y, Siddiqui MA (2021): Immunotherapy in multiple myeloma. Cancer Treat Res Commun 29: 100468.
 
12.
Shah N, Chari A, Scott E, et al. (2020): B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) in multiple myeloma: rationale for targeting and current therapeutic approaches. Leukemia 34: 985-1005.
 
13.
Mateos MV, Weisel K, De Stefano V, et al. (2022): LocoMMotion: a prospective, non-interventional, multinational study of real-life current standards of care in patients with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma. Leukemia 36: 1371-1376.
 
14.
Dimopoulos MA, Richardson P, Lonial S (2022): Treatment options for patients with heavily pretreated relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk 22: 460-473.
 
15.
Dimopoulos MA, Moreau P, Terpos E, et al. (2021): Multiple myeloma: EHA-ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up(†). Ann Oncol 32: 309-322.
 
16.
Rajkumar SV, Harousseau JL, Durie B, et al. (2011): Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1. Blood 117: 4691-4695.
 
17.
Rajkumar SV, Richardson P, San Miguel JF (2015): Guidelines for determination of the number of prior lines of therapy in multiple myeloma. Blood 126: 921-922.
 
18.
Blimark CH, Turesson I, Genell A, et al. (2018): Outcome and survival of myeloma patients diagnosed 2008-2015. Real-world data on 4904 patients from the Swedish Myeloma Registry. Haematologica 103: 506-513.
 
19.
Bruno AS, Willson JL, Opalinska JM, et al. (2020): Recent real-world treatment patterns and outcomes in US patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Expert Rev Hematol 13: 1017-1025.
 
20.
Morè S, Corvatta L, Manieri MV, et al. (2023): Real-world assessment of treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with relapsed-refractory multiple myeloma in an Italian haematological tertiary care centre. Br J Haematol 201: 432-442.
 
21.
Ríos-Tamayo R, Soler JA, García-Sánchez R, et al. (2023): A glimpse into relapsed refractory multiple myeloma treatment in real-world practice in Spain: the GeminiS study. Hematology 28: 2178997.
 
22.
Mateos MV, Ailawadhi S, Costa LJ, et al. (2023): Global disparities in patients with multiple myeloma: a rapid evidence assessment. Blood Cancer J 13: 109.
 
23.
Regionala cancercentrum i samverkan: Nationellt vårdprogram för myelom; version 3.2, Regionala cancercentrum i samverkan. Stockholm, Sweden, 2024 [cited 2025 Feb]. Available from: https://kunskapsbanken.cancerc....
 
24.
Wålinder G, Genell A, Juliusson G, et al. (2022): Regional differences in treatment and outcome for myeloma patients in Sweden: A population based Swedish myeloma register study. Cancer Rep (Hoboken) 5: e1614.
 
25.
Usmani SZ, Garfall AL, van de Donk N, et al. (2021): Teclistamab, a B-cell maturation antigen × CD3 bispecific antibody, in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (MajesTEC-1): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 1 study. Lancet 398: 665-674.
 
26.
Lesokhin AM, Tomasson MH, Arnulf B, et al. (2023): Elranatamab in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: phase 2 MagnetisMM-3 trial results. Nat Med 29: 2259-2267.
 
27.
Uttervall K, Tätting L, Lemonakis K, et al. (2024): Effectiveness and infectious complications of BCMA T-cell engagers in treating multiple myeloma: Real-world evidence from Sweden. Cancer Med 13: e7048.
 
28.
Riedhammer C, Bassermann F, Besemer B, et al. (2024): Real-world analysis of teclistamab in 123 RRMM patients from Germany. Leukemia 38: 365-371.
 
29.
Manier S, Ingegnere T, Escure G, et al. (2022): Current state and next-generation CAR-T cells in multiple myeloma. Blood Rev 54: 100929.
 
30.
Rodriguez-Otero P, San-Miguel JF (2022): Cellular therapy for multiple myeloma: what’s now and what’s next. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2022: 180-189.
 
eISSN:1644-4124
ISSN:1426-3912
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top